Security Is Not a Phase
The penetration test is booked for the last week before launch. Everyone knows the date. It sits in the plan as a box called "Security". That box is the problem. A test in the last week can only…
Read Insight →Test design, regression, device and field testing, UAT — inside the sprint, not after it
Quality is a discipline, not a final step.
Our QA engineers work alongside development throughout each sprint: turning requirements into test cases before the code exists, running regression on every release candidate, testing on the devices and under the conditions the software will actually meet, and documenting defects with the precision that makes them fast to fix. Available inside our projects or as standalone capacity for yours.
Bolted-on QA finds bugs too late, and finds the wrong ones.
Testing squeezed into the final days of a release finds problems after the decisions that caused them are locked in. Fixes get rushed, regressions slip through because there was no baseline to compare against, and the cases that matter most, the offline sync on a site tablet, the label with the wrong lot number, the ERP write-back that silently fails, are exactly the ones a last-minute click-through never reaches.
A defect found while the feature is being designed costs a conversation. The same defect found in the last week costs a rewrite. QA that starts with the requirements is how you get the first kind.
What we deliver.
Manual testing done rigorously, and automation introduced where it pays back, so the suite grows with the product instead of arriving as a promise.
- Test design from the requirements: test cases written as the feature is specified, so ambiguity is found before anyone builds the wrong thing
- Functional and regression testing on every release candidate, with a maintained regression suite that is the baseline every change is compared against
- Device and platform testing for mobile: real iOS and Android devices, OS versions, kiosk mode, rugged handhelds, tablets on a weak connection
- Field-condition and offline testing: what happens when the connection drops mid-upload, when two people edit the same task, when the device runs out of storage
- Integration and data testing: ERP write-backs, reconciliations, label output, exports a partner will reject if a field is wrong
- User acceptance testing support: scripts, walkthroughs and structured feedback capture with your business users, so sign-off means something
- Test automation where it pays back: automated checks for the flows that must never break, run in the pipeline on every change, introduced gradually rather than sold as a finished suite
- Defect documentation a developer can act on without a clarifying conversation: steps, data, environment, expected versus actual, evidence
Why exbisoft.
Embedded, not bolted on.
Our QA engineers work inside the sprint alongside developers, not as a separate team reviewing finished work. They know what changed, why, and what it could have broken, so regression is targeted rather than a full click-through every time.
Tested for the conditions the software will actually meet.
A subcontractor portal that has to work offline on a construction site, a labelling system where a wrong lot number is a regulatory non-conformance, a kiosk app on 500 iPads across Europe: each was tested for its real environment, not just on a developer's machine.
The pipeline is part of the test setup.
Separate development, QA, test and live environments mean every release candidate is tested on a build that is identical to what ships, and a fresh test database per pipeline run means tests never pass by accident on leftover data.
Documentation that saves time.
Defects are documented precisely enough that developers can act on them without a clarifying conversation. Test cases double as living documentation of how the system is supposed to behave.
Standalone or embedded.
Bring us in as dedicated QA capacity for your existing team, testing what your developers build, or as part of a full development engagement. Either way you get engineers, a method and a record, not a checklist.
Need testing capacity you can trust?
Tell us what you are shipping, how it is tested today, and where the last painful bug came from. We will tell you honestly what is missing, and what to automate first.
Start a conversation